21 Apr 2024 7:52 am
Hold on.Beekeeper » 21 Apr 2024, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑ THE COURT, ****!!
“The Second Amended Response has no reference, general or otherwise, to any of these exhibits,”
[...]
“As the trial court correctly observed, the Second Amended Response contained ‘only three citations to purported summary judgment evidence,’ specifically, two references to Exhibit F and one reference to Exhibit E (apparently intending to refer to Exhibit G). Indeed, the Bar not only failed to cite to or argue about any additional documents — the documents are not mentioned at all.”
They had NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE MOTION!! And a VEILED ATTEMPT to try to persuade the court, which had NONE OF IT and ruled to DISMISS ACCORDINGLY!!!
It must REALLY SUCK having a blistered *** you have to carry around constantly!!
Admit that you didn't read your op.